There were two possibilities when it came to Chetla:
i. Either her 22-year stay in the US had been an unmitigated disaster, why the likes of Prominent Personality and other Asansol sorts couldn't follow her into Washington DC, deciding to remain with the KGB and the Paris imposters.
ii. Else, she had made the utmost use of the Baker-Beregovoy Network, inflicting incalculable damage to the narrative of the first-class passengers on the RMS Titanic.
Next, Chetla had used two destructive contemporary conflicts, the Russia-Ukraine War and the Israel-Hamas War, as a political diversion to force Harland and Wolff to file for bankruptcy.
iii. We have done our bit for the democratic side as well. Radakin's intrigues at Annapolis have ended, which meant the topic of concern at the Papal Conclave was Chetla.
There was only one question to resolve: why was the Vatican silent when over the previous two decades, since 2001, the narrative of a Judeo-Christian disaster like the sinking of the RMS Titanic was being subverted and ridiculed from Riyadh and Islamabad and Kolkata?
Did the Vatican no longer wish to identify as a Judeo-Christian institution?
iv. That left Antara, and while she tried to solve the intrigues of the Advanced Consultation Group on Ukraine based in New Delhi (Dina Wadia etc), she was apparently under investigation by the Ukrainians, as "someone with lease aspirations and supported by groups of Germans".
Antara was never contacted or provided employment. What would the Ukrainians conclude? What would be their report card on Antara?
The US-Ukraine mineral deal didn't look half as bad now, did it?
May 2, 2025.
No comments:
Post a Comment