Wednesday, 16 April 2025

Bhogal

 


After solving Rajasthani OSS and whether Antara even needed its information--one bought sweets for oneself--the discussion turned to the fate of the blog FACSIMILE. 

(These questions were being raised by a huge group of Indian journalists from Bhogal in south Delhi, either employed or wealthy.)

Was the London-based PR firm correct when it assumed that if India had many defence attaches abroad, it would curtail Antara's right to share her opinion on various matters? Did more diplomats mean less free speech?

The following had come up in the course of Antara's work:

"Mr Summers' attack on the Treasury was because of Andrew Mellon. It was Mellon's familiarity with medieval Europe and the Hanseatic norms that he had used to strengthen American defence firms, how else were they supposed to tackle Kolkata, which had learnt its shrewdness from the East India Company? That Hanseatic information would also be with Antara, so American defence firms needn't fear Summers and Co."

Thus, the blog FACSIMILE has been given a future, no defence attaches would be able to shut it down.

ii. This left Austria, and how Antara was situated with it. 

Antara grew up in India so that she could appreciate the welfare State model, which created happy, balanced individuals, unlike greedy capitalism, which produced we-know-the-sorts.

Apparently, it was interesting for analysts, who behaved in what manner with Antara while she lived in India. "There was hardly any other way of judging what Summers had done in India when it came to the Carnegies and the Rockefellers and thereby the United States."

Photo: City Palace, Jaipur, 2010.

No comments:

Post a Comment

A useful Iranian regime

What was the purpose of keeping those like Antara in India at all? India had never been to war with the United States, so she was not a Pris...