The relation between the trading community, purportedly from the Marwar region, and Antara's previous generation was tricky.
Anjali kept remarking on their tremendous backing from abroad. Ajit believed they had nothing but the Anglo-Afghan Wars on their mind, no matter how many times you solved them, they'd keep raking them up.
Antara had never heard of Bimal having any trading community friend or acquaintance, his connections were only those approved by the French and the Germans.
Thus, apparently alerted by ACJ, when Obama and Groupe BPCE, the latter a French banking entity, started their work 2009 onwards, it was a severe assault on Antara's previous generation. How it affected relatives on Antara's side was obvious, they no longer had the right to defend the Treasury or the lease.
Groupe BPCE was formed by the 'merger' of several French banks. Anjali often used the word 'marjar', a formal Bengali word for a cat. It might have referred to the considerable 19th century Kolkata support for the Chetla project, including from the Sabarna Choudhury clan.
As was known, Robert A Heinlein (1907-1988), naval officer, aeronautical engineer and sci-fi writer had been used by Kolkata for the Chetla project.
Heinlein, looked somewhat like a Bengali by appearance, was apparently a BT-baiter.
Heinlein had a fictional character called Richard Ames, it was a reference to the British radar stations from right before World War II, called Air Ministry Experimental Station/AMES.
One might conclude that it was not Chetla who had investigated British financiers over the last couple of decades, it was 19th century Kolkata that was coming for British banking.
Like throwaway scraps to a dog, Antara had been allowed to visit the RBI museum in Kolkata during her Nov 2025 visit, it was called 'contact-corroboration', it would suffice for Antara, there were serious incidents unfolding. No one went to Kolkata without doing background work, however, the Sabarna Choudhury clan may have missed that Antara had prepped on British radar stations, on her own, before reaching Kolkata.
On their return from Kolkata, Antara's spouse found a gift hamper from a pet food company at his workplace. It consisted of a diary (probably to indicate Anne Frank), a coffee mug (probably to indicate the Austrian Habsburgs) and a cloth backpack (probably to indicate that all Americans were 'owned' by Moyne).
Thus, 19th century Kolkata had also spent a trivial amount to identify the enemies, such was the confidence generated by Robert A Heinlein.
ii. The Sabarna Choudhury clan had suffered severe intelligence failures, it was somewhat audacious on its part to attempt assaults against British banking just because Antara was accompanying her spouse to Kolkata.
Left to herself, why would Antara go to Kolkata at all? If she had a livelihood, would she ever visit Kolkata? She lived as a dependent, as someone inferior to her spouse, cooking and cleaning for him, hence she was forced to go to Kolkata. An instrument called 'Aadhaar' had been created so that she was never independent, never free, how could she refuse to go?
The Sabarna Chaudhuri clan had never managed to connect BT to Los Alamos or the atom bomb project. It was a kind of intelligence failure that led to banishment, where the Sabarna Chaudhuri clan would not be allowed to live in Kolkata, where uttering their name would be an offence.
The Sabarna Chaudhuri clan had also not understood that if Lenin was important to the Treasury, why did the Soviet KGB provide blackmails against Lenin to the Rajasthanis? What kind of a trap had been laid by the Bolsheviks against Kolkata? It was not enough to open a Party office at Alimuddin Street in Kolkata, you would have to understand what Bolshevism was about.
iii. Despite the above, the Sabarna Chaudhuri clan was asserting, and such assertion usually preceded the rise of an authoritarian political party. We've already had AAP, which meant the White House in DC was about to be surprised by disclosures about the 1942 Wannsee Conference.
That at the Wannsee Conference, Adolf Eichmann had to take responsibility for entrapment of British aristocrats (like the Young family, despised in Punjab, Haryana and Delhi), the Mahalanobis family could have easily taken responsibility as well.
With Donald Trump as a Mahalanobis loyalist as well as fond of British aristocrats, how was he supposed to behave after that disclosure?
November 18, 2025.
No comments:
Post a Comment