It ought to be noted that the Bank of England was refusing to release the proforma required by Antara to manage the Aadhaar situation.
The Office of the British Prime Minister, regardless of the incumbent, was otherwise highly involved in encouraging whoever was willing to attack Antara.
Antara would request an investigation into the Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing, which had bought the London Metal Exchange in 2012, if financial journalists based in Kolkata were misusing the London Metal Exchange to manage the crypto-mania within the SEC/Securities and Exchange Commission, why Bank of England was holding back the proforma.
Antara would also request for physical protection of herself and her spouse from the Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing, many of her former ACJ batchmates were heavily invested in it.
ii. "From 1985 onwards, it had been the responsibility of the United Kingdom Govt to hold back the proforma and strengthen Japan as a business challenge to the United States.
Holding back the proforma was managed by the Securities and Investment Board, established in 1985 after BT's House was given away.
SIB became Financial Services Authority/FSA, managing from 2001 to 2013, avoiding corroboration for Antara.
Financial Services Authority was now called the Financial Conduct Authority/FCA, it was independent of the UK Govt and thereby fully in NRI control.
(FCA didn't require biometrics for online transactions, a phone and a password were enough. It was thereby strange that the Bank of England didn't protest that Aadhaar was not an internationally accepted financial norm.)
If FCA was already involved in gross irregularity to ensure Antara never got her proforma, why was Antara being threatened that after Diwali 2025, Keir Starmer would ensure that no Indian shopkeeper accepted cash/currency notes from Antara, that it was the only purpose of Starmer's visit to India?
October 6, 2025.
No comments:
Post a Comment