Since Antara was not the kind of individual who discussed violent incidents in the US (given she lived in India), most blog readers would wonder, how would she clarify her stance on the matter?
The spouse had already extensively written on the rise of the far-Right in Europe, that was back in 2009. The spouse's article on the European far-Right was published on October 17, 2009, the day Anjali passed away. The spouse's article had gained quite a bit of popularity among ACJ students.
Like a self-fulfilling prophecy, 2013 onwards, the spouse's fear of the far-Right and Europe turned out to be true, we have been discussing the rise of the AfD, including Alice Weidel and Bodo Ramelow. It coincided with many of Antara's former schoolmates travelling to Jungfrau, Switzerland, known as the locale of James Bond franchise movies over the years. Antara's living condition in India kept worsening from around that time, she'd often be warned, "Do you want to be violated at a Swiss chalet?"
Thus, the far-Right in Europe at least, was intricately linked to British intelligence. It was also linked to Anjali's passing away. While alive, Anjali's grandfather Motilal Sarkar had used the Patrouille de France/air force acrobatics blackmail to make sure the Hanseatic League was only available to her, not to Ajit. How clever of Motilal Sarkar, he was not betraying the RMS Titanic narrative, so American families would remain pleased with NS Road (while avoiding Ajit and Antara) while Europe remained in the firm grip of Anjali.
Some marriage it was, Ajit-Anjali, married in the summer of 1969.
When Antara needed some protection from AfD's rise since 2013, employment, arbitrary govt documents, who'd help her, the way NS Road had arranged it?
ii. Would Antara be able to discuss violent incidents in the US in terms of gun laws and gun control? Antara had been warned a few years ago that the National Rifle Association/NRA (founded in 1871) was welcoming of NRIs, but she had not been provided a lease context. What had the lease family thought of the Tagore excesses in 19th century US and guns? Without such a context, Antara wouldn't be able to discuss the Second Amendment.
Discussion of gun laws and gun control had been used in the past to fell financiers, "what Sandy Hook did for the Global South" used to be the dominant topic of conversation till a few years ago. It was strange how no financier in the world could connect the Nazi Holocaust to the Sandy Hook massacre, they wouldn't write an oped or discuss it in an online interview and if wealth and clout couldn't untangle such knots, why chase free trade deals? Who was this world meant for?
In her own time, in 2025, Antara would be called irresponsible if she repeatedly discussed Antonin Novotny, connected the Poland drone incident to the AfD but didn't bring up the violent incident in the US. She'd be going the way of the other financiers, not pointing out that if Bengali women wanted to destroy the Polish lease, if they wanted to maintain a lease without any Czech Silesian/Sleza Valley influence, then they'd need to threaten both Poland and the White House in DC within days of each other, the way it happened.
There, it was done. The violent incident in the US had been analysed and solved.
It didn't require any discussion of far-Right extremism, the Jan 6 2021 rioting or even the Pentagon.
Bengali women had felt threatened that the White House had too many allies, that they were not allies from the Global South.
iii. The Taiwanese had hoped that their late entry into the American political scene, long after WWII was over, would be discussed in terms of a Caucasian identity for the United States. Wasn't that a cheesy little Hitler trap set for the lease family?
Next, the Taiwanese had expected that if they brought the Alamo Girl to Delhi, to show that the Pullmans had always depended on the Kumars who had always depended on NS Road, then Antara would be caught in a permanent hell, moving from spouse to former college friend to sibling for support, not realising they were one and the same.
The Taiwanese had feared that Antara would use the Nazi Holocaust to ingratiate herself with the US Govt, well she was discussing the Bengali attempt to destroy the Polish lease and their fear of FDR-Harry Hopkins, did the Taiwanese find any US official feeling grateful?
Thus, Taiwan was beginning to seem like a failed venture, well past its prime, which meant the Pentagon bosses were correct in their estimate: "Colin Powell was our last chance to keep China and Taiwan as two separate countries".
iv. All of the above was the politics of Aadhaar, a global near-consensus that if we denied a financier all rights as a citizen, could we keep China and Taiwan separate and maintain the fiction of Mao's Communism?
September 12, 2025.
No comments:
Post a Comment