Hegseth's meeting

One would have to assume that the Class of 1995 and ACJ wanted to find out how hardline would be the opponent's stance on currency. 

It was typical of post-1991 Indian thinking, it assumed that Nazi influence was only measured within the Pentagon, it was never assessed within the Treasury. 

Those who took a hardline stance on traditional currencies, for example Antara, were so comfortably mentored by the British understanding of Chinese nationalism that they didn't consider that all Asians disliked European royal dynasties.

That if Japan accepted the 1951 Treaty of San Francisco (peace with the Allied Powers), it was apparently on the advice of the highly decorated Lt Gen Lionel Protip 'Bogey' Sen, who had known about the imminent East German uprising of 1953, and knew Germany would remain truncated till Kolkata and CPM understood what banking and Treasury meant to the westerners.   

ii. Lt Gen Lionel Protip 'Bogey' Sen had attended the Royal Military Academy at Sandhurst (without any known controversy or expulsion),

had joined the Cheshire Regiment of the British Army on graduation (at least Alice Weidel and AfD were now understood, it was about currencies and the Agency arriving late in Japan),

and next joined the Indian Army as part of the 10th Baluch Regiment (so the purpose of importing Baluchi Malik Siraj to ACJ was also obvious.) 

So Pete Hegseth's meeting was a victory lap!

NRIs and Delhi citizenry, AAP and Indian honchos, forced the Pentagon to hold back documents and information on West Point that was required by Antara. 

Then through cowardly and disgraceful behaviour, an attack was devised against Antara, using Lt Gen Lionel Protip 'Bogey' Sen, who probably wanted Poland to lose and the Bengalis of Kolkata to triumph over the lease, currency, Treasury etc. 

Was there any civilised way to respond to such a maneuver? What would Antara say, that if Lionel Protip attended Sandhurst, why weren't there enough detractors to give him trouble while he was studying there?

That ACJ was suspected to be an interest group but it turned out to be one against BT? Its persona was false, except hostility towards Poland?

iii. There was only one answer left. 

At Ajit-Anjali's wedding, BT didn't have the full wedding dinner (in Asansol, the bride's side), he had 1.5 kilos of 'mishti doi'/sweetened yoghurt and 80 roshogollas. 

"Yes, I was diabetic, but no rules applied when my son was getting married," BT had said. It was a chaotic scene, wedding guests falling over each other to see him achieve that feat.

Did ACJ think that Vladimir Putin's tepid and boring tenure as Russian President managed to out-maneuver 80 Russian imperial intelligence outfits?

No?

Then calm down, celebrate less. 

BT at Ajit-Anjali's wedding, having just finished off 1.5 kilos of 'mishti doi' and 80 roshogollas.

September 30, 2025.