Whose Pentagon was it anyway? The British or Sam Altman's?

Most of us, at some point in our lives, have wondered, what did Barack Obama think of on a day-to-day basis?

A Harvard-educated lawyer, did he think of the landmark legal cases in the history of the United States?

A savvy contemporary, did he think of the dangers of Artificial Intelligence, especially when OpenAI and Sam Altman were starting off in India, with a single employee called Pragya?

Pragya was a name that created a sense of anxiety in Antara. In her reading into Hindu philosophy, she had understood that 'Pragya'/Prajna was higher consciousness, when the person meditating was close to achieving salvation/reaching her destination. 

The BJP-RSS had a politician called Pragya Singh Thakur or Sadhvi Pragya, she had once been accused in the Malegaon blast case, later she became a Member of Parliament as well as a member of the Parliamentary Committee on Defence.

One of Antara's former workplaces had a city reporter called Pragya. She was deliberately offensive towards Antara, her appearance and clothing indicated a lot of Pentagon support, always in tank tops, so maybe backed by M1 Abrams tanks, manufactured by GDLS since 1978. (GDLS was one of the main reasons Antara didn't get a decent life, apparently it loved Antara's parents but didn't quite like the idea of Antara.)

Or it might even be that newsroom Pragya had the backing of Bradley tank manufacturers as well, it was probably called BAE Systems Platforms and Services, BAE for British Aerospace.

ii. Did Barack Obama think of ways to take global politics forward, apparently he had been known to regret that a "slight use of Thurn und Taxis" and German and Austrian intelligence had collapsed in a heap. 

In response, the Indian diplomatic community had suggested to Obama that Thurn und Taxis be used round-the-clock, "maybe Europe itself would cease to exist".

It was the Beleghata honcho who had apparently intervened against such a move, purely out of nostalgia, "Rather request Mukesh to make a full down payment on some of those properties along Pennsylvania Avenue in Washington DC." 

Such a move by the Beleghata honcho explained the constant overtures to Antara over the last year or so, "Remember, the White House wouldn't do for the legit lease, it was compromised and fully in control of the British General Staff, we would need new institutions and new buildings as well."

And yet when Barack Obama apparently set his focus on West Bengal, its towns and districts, its people and their stories, he didn't use any of the above. He chose the concept of "irregular warfare" from India's war with Pakistan in 1948. It meant Obama would be using, say the British or Israeli military, but they'd be in civilian garbs, as they were in the 1948 war. 

It might be a British dancing duo mocking BT's alleged stance on unmanned flights, it might be the Reading and Leeds music festival, it might even be Edward VIII's abdication. Thus, any advisory to Ukraine was becoming a discussion of Obama's planned 'irregular warfare' for we had been led to believe that Russia had invaded Ukraine, neither Obama's nor Pakistan's involvement was meant to be discussed. 

iii. The Russians would argue that they had recovered documents from the ruins of the Third Reich, they had taken German Prisoners of War but they had not been able to establish why Ukraine's supply of intelligence to Bengal from 1900 to 1912 was so damaging that it led to the Nazi Holocaust. 

If the Soviets didn't understand the Nazi Holocaust, then no one else would and Kolkata would be unforgiving.

By 1906, if a supposed lease-based House called Belcourt Seminary had come up within the United States, what further damage were the Ukrainians causing?

It would bring us back to the pars-pro-toto concept, where a part indicated the entirety, used for discussing cryptocurrency's role in the global economy. In such a situation, the invasion of Ukraine was meant to be treated as invasion of Europe, a part indicating the entirety. 

IE journalists had dropped hints right from 2022, "the Ukrainians were Caucasians". 

Hence Putin's recent comment, "Ukraine needn't join NATO". 

Ukraine had once provided shelter to a European lease, hence Ukraine was Europe. 

The Biden-Harris administration had allowed Putin to invade Europe in February 2022, it was 'pars pro toto' in use.

If Trump-Vance shouted at Zelensky within the Oval Office, they were shouting at Europe, not at Ukraine.

August 25, 2025.