Poland, France, Afghanistan

This was another 'demanded' blogpost. 

It was getting worrying now, was Antara being interrogated? It seemed so, what if recent Third World/Global South immigrants were in charge of her interrogation?

What were the legal implications, once Trump's and maybe Vance's Presidential terms were over? We'd need legislations if recently-arrived immigrants to the US and UK could immediately participate in a torture regimen against Antara. 

Antara was 'allowed' to a watch a documentary that mentioned Northern Alliance's Abdul Rashid Dostum. What did Antara make of it, what was her opinion on the matter?

Antara thought it was about Poland, how NS Road had devised the attack on Poland and what roles would be played in that script by Indian wealthy/Marwaris and Indian royals. So here went the 'demanded' blogpost:

****

Some of you had wondered if there were internal divisions or factions within the NS Road family, as part of a pre-determined script, in order to confound both the United States as well as the likes of Antara. 

Maybe they'd find out, too late in the day, that even the supposed reversals that NS Road had suffered, say the delay in imposing Lutheran NGO rule over Israel, ended up serving some ulterior motive.  

One hypothesis was that NS Road had enough NATO snitches and would keep getting stronger, for if it had devised a script factoring in 'interceptors', then NATO had known that without 'interception', Antara would not have been able to survive for a day. 

If both NS Road and NATO had known about 'interception', what were the Delhi media honchos complaining about? Interception and code-breaking were legal war tactics, else there wouldn't be any war at all. In such a case, why did the Delhi media honchos approach higher echelons of global militaries for advanced torture against Antara, given she was already at the receiving end of State persecution of an individual--denial of documents, deliberate unemployment, malnutrition and starvation?

People across the world assumed that NS Road divided along the politics of grabbing western defence firms, that Suri (Birbhum district) had recommended keeping France at the centre of the defence acquisition politics so that it wouldn't be able to ally with the United States. (It was supposedly played out during the Rafale acquisition.) 

That approach also had the support of the Indian wealthy or the Marwaris, it was their role in the script, why Antara was being interrogated. 

The rest of NS Road apparently preferred France as an ally of the Global South, not in a centrist mode, given it had capitulated to the German Nazis in WWII and remained under occupation from 1940 onwards.

ii. Antara felt that Suri (Birbhum district) as a dividing line when it came to grabbing western defence firms was a mere decoy. 

The actual dividing line was Jamtara (Jharkhand district), who represented Indian royals and Bollywood, since Jamtara had been aware that the Jan 6 2021 US Capitol rioting couldn't have taken place without the Nazi-SS agreeing to it, what kept the legit lease in contention, as discussed in FACSIMILE on July 29, 2025.

It ought to have unleashed mayhem by now, but if there was anything holding back the Prophet controversy-seekers, it was that Antara had asked for five years for her lease proposal and at least several years to devise a Treasury instrument that could battle or defeat UPI. 

When Antara was asking for delay, Jamtara couldn't ask for further delay to let the Class of 1995 make up or stay in contention.

Did Dostum prefer delay like Jamtara? Surely this was no longer 'stretching' the concept of national security of the United States of America, as the NRIs had earlier thought?

July 30, 2025.