Wednesday, 11 June 2025

The G7 story: To defeat Ukraine, let Dhaka formally join NATO

Never mind which British intelligence networks were being supplanted by Hong Kong-based ones, were Ajit and Anjali not entrusted with any lease-related responsibilities?

What about the need to protect the legit lease from the complicated espionage-based intrigues that the Communists were constantly inflicting on the world?

Antara was not sure, but it seemed that Ajit and Anjali were not entrusted with any responsibility but the physical security of the legit lease heir. These were chaperone duties, so to say, and it was at such a juncture that the narrative of the Hackney Jews (CLASS ACT), and their decision to lend a House to the British royal family, became an important breakthrough for Antara. (Others might have already known about it.)

What Antara had learnt was that Larry Elisson, Jyoti Basu and possibly Ford had drafted/provided inputs to the 1980-Mykolaiv arrangement. Now it seemed, given the enthusiasm emanating from Bengaluru, that the Hackney Jews had provided inputs as well, that would include the British Rothschilds and the Montefiore family, wouldn't it?

Now it was getting interesting, how would Antara know how the Gorings, the British Rothschilds, the Montefiore family felt about Poland? What was their stance on Poland but more importantly, say on inhabitants of Sleza Valley?

Let's leave it at that, it was but natural that Antara would protest her parents' constant insistence to chaperone her. What did she know, that it was probably their only lease involvement? If she took it away, they had no further say in lease matters, beaten by the Hasidim?

Antara had her own reasons to try and avoid her parents accompanying her wherever she went. It had begun to seem that by the early 1990s, several of her batchmates were thriving on information and support provided by British defence firms. There were too many sly, underhand comments, too much sniggering, they were, after all, laughing at the father/parent of a batchmate.

"No office work, always available for chaperone duties?" said one of them. That was after the 1991 BoP crisis and establishment of ties with Israel. 

"Look at the scooter streaking down the field, with hair flying," others would say, as Ajit drove his scooter across Pologround to pick up Antara from a Mathematics coaching centre. This was serious, the British defence firms thought Stagg Field was a joke, where the first nuclear chain reaction had taken place by Fermi and his associates in the early 1940s?

It had serious implications, even if every American swore loyalty to the CPM Politburo. The Stagg Field laboratory was called The Pile, Ground Zero after the WTC Towers had collapsed was called the Pile as well. That was taking a joke farther than it should have gone.

Let's say the British defence firms believed that the Stagg Field work was influenced by Ukrainian intelligence, trying to protect the lease family in India. 

Why was it funny, had the British already developed a way of harnessing atomic energy? Was Ukrainian intelligence less/lower than Dhaka intelligence? Was it wrong for interest groups to protect the lease family, if it got stranded in a hostile area?

Antara was uncomfortable in the early 1990s because of her batchmates, how comfortable was she in 2025? Take a guess?

June 11, 2025.

No comments:

Post a Comment

A useful Iranian regime

What was the purpose of keeping those like Antara in India at all? India had never been to war with the United States, so she was not a Pris...