Who was Larry?

1. One explanation for Oświęcim to return to Poland in 1918 was probably because Kolkata wanted the House to be associated with Holocaust disrepute, which would be difficult had it stayed within Galicia/Austria, given the latter's long and prominent ruling history.

2. Another would be to disgrace the banking profession itself, that the Oświęcim bankers were of no consequence when it came to preventing major human tragedies and that it needed a strong monarchical hand to prevent a Holocaust. (This was thereby an argument against the Industrial Revolution and the rise of the buorgeois middle-class, hence Who was Larry?)

3. The third would be punish the Oświęcim bankers through the allegation that it was Austria that had helped during the Sannyasi Rebellion in Bengal of the 1770s, not the bankers themselves. Thus, Oświęcim bankers would be forever attacked for the Sannyasi Rebellion but not get any credit for it. 

4. However, the worst attack from Kolkata was that the Oświęcim bankers wouldn't be able to prove any financing activity of theirs. This was a bad one, since central Europe had used subterfuge when it came to the US Govt and blackmails against it. 

Kolkata, on the other hand, could easily prove how it influenced the US Govt through the 19th century. Even in 2025, Kolkata apparently managed the US Govt.